Case Study

Patient D,

Male, Nepalese

Table of Contents

Patient Overview

Age at time of treatment: 18 – 25
Injury Level: C4, C5
Treatment Received: Stem Cells, Epidural Stimulation
Location of Treatment: Thailand
Time between injury and treatment: 2 – 5 years
Date of Surgery: 17/06/2018
Date of Discharge: 26/07/2018

Condition on Admission

Patient sustained a traumatic spinal cord injury at T7-T8 level on May 31, 2015. His MRI scan showed T8 fracture dislocation with subsequent partial spinal cord myelomalacia (softening of the spinal cord). Patient is paraplegic, so fine motor skills in his hands and fingers are normal. Patient has loss of sensation and motor function in his bilateral lower limbs, and decreased mobility. Patient is able to stand with support, but for only a short period of time. He does not have a history of spasticity, severe spasms/spastic attacks, or neuropathic pain. Patient experiences bowel and bladder incontinence but is independent in his daily life activities.

Previous Therapies & Treatments

Patient received T6 – T10 pedicle screw fixation, plus fusion with a bone graft. He received analgesics, IV fluids, and physiotherapy treatment before being admitted to one of Verita Neuro’s partner hospitals. He experienced minor improvements in his condition following these interventions.

Patient sustained a traumatic spinal cord injury at T7-T8 level on May 31, 2015. His MRI scan showed T8 fracture dislocation with subsequent partial spinal cord myelomalacia (softening of the spinal cord). Patient is paraplegic, so fine motor skills in his hands and fingers are normal. Patient has loss of sensation and motor function in his bilateral lower limbs, and decreased mobility. Patient is able to stand with support, but for only a short period of time. He does not have a history of spasticity, severe spasms/spastic attacks, or neuropathic pain. Patient experiences bowel and bladder incontinence but is independent in his daily life activities.

Verita Neuro Treatment Received

After a spinal MRI scan, and comprehensive blood work, the patient underwent laminectomy and implantation of the epidural spinal cord stimulator on July 12th, 2018. The device is the ‘Medtronic Restore Advance 16-electrode MRI Compatible Device’. The surgery and post-operative care proceeded without significant adverse effects and no complications were reported during the hospital stay. There was normal healing of the surgical wound.

After epidural stimulation surgery, patient received 96 mapping sessions and 29 physical therapy sessions. Patient also received 40 million Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) through one IV injection and 80 million Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells (hAFSCs) through two lumbar puncture injections. All treatments, including lumbar puncture injections, went well without adverse effects and no short-term or acute complications were reported during the treatment.

Post-surgical device mapping and rehabilitation was carried out for 35 days, then the patient was discharged.

Patient-D Verita Neuro Treatment Received

Results

Patient has developed some voluntary muscle control in lower limbs. He is able to stand up with support and take assisted steps. He is able to lock his knee and take steps, and is stronger on the right side than the left. With more physical therapy, we expect to see improvement in this area. Balance and coordination improved moderately. He is also able to stand with support for a longer period of time due to increased strength and stamina. Patient can sit up straighter when epidural stimulation device is switched on and can now sit without back support. Patient is able to take coordinated steps with assistance in foot placement. With physical therapy, muscle mass in thighs has noticeably increased to 3 cm.
Patient has not regained any sensation in these areas. However, patient has received stem cell treatment. Therefore we expect to see results in this area within 3 months.
During physical therapy, patient was able to sweat, evidencing that his sweating ability has improved. There was no noticeable change in bladder and bowel functions.

Patient-D Other Results

Improvements are monitored in 15 targeted areas: 11 Motor areas and 4 Sensory areas. However, the number of targeted areas may vary depending on patient’s condition prior to admission. If patient does not experience symptoms in certain Motor/Sensory functions, or is not impaired in a specific targeted area prior to surgery, it is excluded from the report (Not Applicable). If there is progress in any given area — either mild, moderate, or significant — it is measured and reported as positive (“Yes”). No improvement, the existence of pain or spasms, or an inability to perform a measured function is reported as “No”.

Results Interpretation

Patient is paraplegic with impairment in motor and sensory functions from only the waist down. Therefore fine motor skills were not measured for this case. Patient does not have a history of spasticity or neuropathic pain, so these have been excluded from the case report. Motor function improved in 8 of 8 targeted areas when the epidural stimulation device was switched on. Sensory function improved in 1 of 3 targeted areas. Overall improvement was seen in 9 of 11 of targeted motor and sensory function areas.